?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Capital Adventures
October 12th, 2009
10:15 pm
[User Picture]

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Housework




After a certain amount of time, the dishes did get done.

In other news, someone on LiveJournal has hotlinked to a different version of A sparrow at Fidel's which I originally took and posted on 25/11/2007. That's just bizarre. Someone's also hotlinked to my most recent orchid pic from tagged.com, which looks like a hotbed of spam, tasteless personals and other assorted ick. People, please, if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

Tags: ,

(12 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:03 am (UTC)

if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
OK!!!!
[User Picture]
From:dianavilliers
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:13 am (UTC)

Re: if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
So it's you that's been nicking the flower shots for your tasteless personals?
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:18 am (UTC)

Re: if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
well not yet but now that you've put the idea in my head...
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:27 am (UTC)

Re: if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
Done!
[User Picture]
From:dianavilliers
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:43 am (UTC)

Re: if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
I suppose theft with credit is marginally better than theft without credit, but if that's your idea of a tasteless personal...
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 11:05 am (UTC)

Re: if you're going to blatantly nick something, why don't you at least nick the good photos?

(Link)
Actually, it's my idea of showing off a very good rainbow shot.

And I really did think you were talking about an anti shark device when I first read the title.

I've got to run now. See you in a few hours.
[User Picture]
From:dianavilliers
Date:October 12th, 2009 11:15 am (UTC)

Compliments: watch me accept them

(Link)
Awww fanks. G'night.

(I'm really not sure where the sharks come into it all?)
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 03:14 pm (UTC)

Re: Compliments: watch me accept them

(Link)
You do not accept compliments well. You are far too guarded for that.

There are places that put out nets to keep sharks out. Believe it or not, nets for fishing were used a lot longer than the world wide web has been around. ;-)
[User Picture]
From:dianavilliers
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:00 pm (UTC)

Re: Compliments: watch me accept them

(Link)
Ah - you were talking about the net deprivation bit, not the attractive squall bit. Understanding dawns.

Guarded. Yes, that's an accurate assessment.
[User Picture]
From:firesmithsghost
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:03 pm (UTC)

Re: Compliments: watch me accept them

(Link)
I am a punslinger.

Don't hate me for that. ( there is so much more!)
[User Picture]
From:wcg
Date:October 12th, 2009 01:25 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Lovely thin film iridescence you got there. I suppose both you and I look at it and think in terms of how the thickness is changing by half wavelengths.
[User Picture]
From:dianavilliers
Date:October 12th, 2009 10:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
You know it. Weird stuff, that light and matter.
Powered by LiveJournal.com